Viewing archives for Featured

Thank you for visiting the HLA website, we are updating the site to reflect changes in our organisation. Contact us if you have any questions. Contact us

“AI literacy for those who are on the ground is key” – a humanitarian perspective from Lebanon

What happens when a humanitarian communications specialist with 15 years of field experience starts using AI – and then turns that learning into advocacy for AI literacy and opportunities?

In this interview, we hear from Nour Arab from Lebanon, on her journey from early AI experimentation to building tools for her own community, and why she believes AI literacy is the most urgent need facing the sector today.

Nour was one of 1,729 individuals from 120+ countries and territories who participated in the Humanitarian Leadership Academy and Data Friendly Space’s Humanitarian AI January 2026 pulse survey – an ongoing effort to track how humanitarians are using AI in their work. She has since engaged with ongoing HLA initiatives including attendance at humanitarian AI webinars and LinkedIn discussions.

With a background spanning field operations, camp management, community engagement, project management, and communications, Nour brings a breadth of perspective to the question of how AI can – and should – be used in humanitarian contexts. She is also a NORCAP member and an advisory board member with the Community Engagement Forum, where she advocates for community-centred approaches to AI.

In her own words, drawn from a follow-up interview conducted by research co-lead Ka Man Parkinson, Nour explains how she is currently using AI, what she has built with it – including a fundraising website for her home city of Tripoli, Lebanon – and what she believes the global humanitarian community needs to do next.

Introducing Nour

I’ve been humanitarian for 15 years. I started as a field worker in Lebanon, and the work evolved across different positions here and there with UN agencies, NGOs, and governments around the world. I’m also a NORCAP member. My last assignment was with NRC as a global communications consultant for the Community Engagement Forum, which helps practitioners work on community engagement and get evidence-based findings from the field to improve that work with communities.

I’ve jumped across different roles, and I really felt like I had this unique expertise – starting from the field, knowing three different languages, doing project management, training, communications. And then AI came, and it started to eat into some of the things I do every day. And this is where I realised that there’s something that needs to be done. I need to start learning it and see how to turn that fear into something that’s productive – to build this AI literacy that can help me do the work, but differently, since the sector is all changing. To stay relevant, I need to jump on that very fast train that we’re all on.

Starting small, thinking big: Nour’s journey into AI

It started with simple steps – summarise this report for me – and every day I started using it more and more for different tasks, until I started to become comfortable to speak to it and explore different tools depending on the needs that I have for my current problem. I have this problem, how can I fix it? I ask questions in the chat, and then I start to get a few different options to see how to solve this.

It’s been such a nice journey that was actually worth sharing, so I started to become more vocal about it on LinkedIn – to advocate for AI use that is grounded in field experiences, because I’ve seen a lot of resistance also among humanitarians for the very right reasons: no, we don’t want to be using AI, it’s unethical, it’s scary, there’s a lot of bias in it, there’s a lot of control, the things that we cannot control.

In my own opinion, this fear is keeping them away from the conversation, and keeping them away from making the AI better. If the people with ethics, with field experience, with deep accountability to communities don’t show up with their judgement and their data, these systems will be shaped without us. The most ethical thing we can do right now isn’t to refuse. It’s to participate, carefully and visibly, so the tools that get built carry our fingerprints.

On language and AI tools

While I speak three languages, I use AI tools in English, and of course the quality in English is much better. I haven’t used French much in the prompting. I can see that Claude is not the best in Arabic. I am also interested in trying the same prompt using Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek. Believe it or not, DeepSeek is the best in Arabic, which is quite interesting. I’m an Arabic native speaker, but maybe I’m not someone who can write super formal Arabic, so I returned to DeepSeek to help me with that. Even the dialect is on point. When I try to use ChatGPT’s speaking feature in Arabic, it comes back with a different accent – Jordanian rather than Lebanese – and it doesn’t pick up all the dialect well. But in DeepSeek, it’s much, much better.

Beyond the chatbot: building contextualised humanitarian tools

Currently I’m developing an agent to help me with my own writing and how I want to evolve in the sector. Not just a knowledge base or a brand, but rather something that challenges me every day – brainstorming with me. I’m using it as a thought partner. And it’s been super interesting. I know that AI agrees a lot with people, but we can add some skills to it so it can challenge us a lot.

I’m also exploring turning resource libraries and knowledge bases into something digital and much more user-friendly. Instead of Excel sheets, I’m working on HTML platforms that are very easy to navigate. But I’m also aware that the whole search experience is changing – people are going to Claude or ChatGPT to ask questions instead of Google. People now have a much shorter focus. So, as a humanitarian, I shouldn’t offer them a website with 200 different tools to check, but rather tailor their need differently. Creating a resource library, but also having a chatbot that you can speak to: “I have this problem, which tool can help me solve it?” And then it gives you a list of tools, and you add some context, and it helps you contextualise the tool from being a standard tool that works everywhere to something that works in the field.

Nour’s humanitarian AI use case: building for community – the Tripoli Emergency Fund website

Because of AI, and thanks to AI, I’m able to work more for my city that I love. There was a very unfortunate event that happened two months ago. Two buildings collapsed – it’s not related to war, but related to many, many different things. I was called by the municipality and the order of engineers, along with other people, to work on an initiative that we call the Tripoli Emergency Fund, and its role is to build a project that is funded by the people to support the reinforcement of 800 buildings at risk of collapsing.

So AI did not just give me time to attend those meetings and be part of these conversations, but also it gave me the tools. I built a website for this initiative using Lovable. The prototype really took around 10 minutes. And then we had something that we could go live with, but of course there’s lots of work that needs to be done – the brand, what you want to say to people, the payments, the payment policy, the governance framework. But without AI, I wouldn’t be able to create this website in the six weeks it took at the end. It would have taken a lot more time.

In Lebanon, we’ve had lots of challenges with transparency in the last five years – trusting the government, trusting civil society initiatives. So we wanted to go all transparent with the people and tell them where the money is going, how much money we collected, how much money was spent on the reinforcement, who is working on what. We got endorsements from the mayor and the order of engineers. We added names of individuals and institutions that donated. And I was also able to translate it in a few prompts from Arabic to English, which was amazing. Now every feature that I edit can be edited in both languages. Before, I used to make it all manual everywhere. Maybe I would forget something. Now everything is just going perfect.

The platform still has lots of bugs, so I’m not saying the system is perfect. We had to test it many times. I even tested the payment method more than 20 times – sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. So a human needs to monitor this on a regular basis to make sure that things are flowing well. I always recommend that whenever people want to use AI, not to just create the tool and disappear, but also make budget for maintenance.

What made me really happy was the participation of different civil society members. One of the local NGOs we had in our city made this amazing presentation using NotebookLM to illustrate the situation of the buildings – who owns, who’s renting in the building, what are the shops available, where are the illegal constructions. When you see things visually, they make a lot more sense and you get a whole different perspective on how you’d like to move forward. Just the fact that local NGOs are starting to think this way is amazing, really. And it’s super promising for the future of AI in the humanitarian field.

The initiative was added as a best practice by MedCities, a global platform that works with lots of cities around the world on urban planning. It’s incredible what AI can do for local people without needing much funding.

The most urgent need: AI literacy that is grounded and tailored

For me, it really starts with AI literacy. We’ve been speaking a lot about small language models, building small language models for people – but not really thinking about what people can do on such a small scale to solve their very small problems in a more efficient way, in a cheaper way.

I understand there’s a huge need for governance frameworks and policy work around how to use AI safely. But nobody’s waiting. People are building anyway, and people are using LLMs that we may not like. They’re building their memory there. Very few are comfortable migrating their history from an LLM to another that is safer, especially when you’re reaching lots of people everywhere.

And we’re at risk of repeating it in a much bigger way. AI massively scales our ability to collect community feedback – voice notes, surveys, multilingual transcripts. We could be drowning in input within a year. But are we ready for feedback at a thousand times the volume if we didn’t listen the first time? More data isn’t the same as more listening. If the willingness to act on what we hear isn’t there, we’re going to generate huge archives of unheard voices and call it accountability. That’s worse than silence.

There’s also the question of how we, as humanitarians, add content to the LLMs in a way that is synthesised without keeping away some community groups, or gender, etc. There’s lots of work that needs to be done on advocating for what content comes first, and who should be prioritised in the whole response.
 
The problem is not building one big solution for everyone. We had this mistake with digital transformation – we spent millions of dollars trying to create digital products that nobody used, because they were all made in San Francisco and London, away from the people that they actually should serve. This is a golden time for us to realise that the power is no longer on the upper end. Maybe only AI literacy can solve so many problems for local organisations working with communities.

The AI literacy I’d like to see is tailored. First, to simplify the mundane tasks that everybody, all organisations, need to do to make the job done. But also saving some time to prompt more and more the vision and the strategy of these local organisations, how they would like to move further. Also work on their research skills. Now, as research has changed with AI, they can now test different angles in a few clicks. This has been almost impossible before. It took a lot of time and a lot of resources.

Looking ahead and a closing message

In the next 12 months, I’d like to see more people using AI to save some of the important time that they spend doing some work, to focusing more on the vision and the strategy of their organisation. For me, I’d like to explore working on AI agents for local organisations – starting with the case study that studies how local organisations in my city are using AI, and how AI can help them improve their response better. I also want to push a lot more on what communities want out of AI, with my role as an advisory board member with the Community Engagement Forum, and independently. I want to meet people who have solved specific problems using AI, and see how this can be replicated to other contexts as well.

I’d like to see donors understand that people will not keep on producing things if not supported financially. Local NGOs are doing a lot more with AI now, but they still need funding to hire the right people, to give enough time for innovation. Innovation needs funding.

It’s a very exciting time we’re living in. It’s loaded with big emotions of fear, frustration, joy, and opportunities that come with AI. One thing we can do to manage that overwhelming feeling is by starting to adopt AI every day with simple steps. Just delegate a few tasks and learn on the go. There are so many interesting courses that can be found. But applying it to the context needs practical applications.

The solution is not always creating something big that solves big problems. It’s building with the right people. The problem has never been a tool – but rather solving the issue in a specific way, with the right people. AI literacy for those who are on the ground is key to solving problems in a more grounded way, and in a cheaper way as well.

A woman with long, dark, wavy hair and light skin smiles gently at the camera. She is wearing a white shirt and gold earrings, posing in front of a plain brown background.
The solution is not always creating something big that solves big problems. It’s building with the right people.
Nour Arab

Thank you to Nour for sharing her work and perspectives and for her contributions to the Humanitarian AI January 2026 pulse survey conducted by the Humanitarian Leadership Academy and Data Friendly Space. This work builds on the 2025 foundational study and the supporting resources including reports, podcasts and webinars available on the research landing page.
 

You may also be interested in

Humanitarian AI interview with Abdullah Azimi from Afghanistan
Read the article

Humanitarian AI interview with Ivan Toga from Uganda
Read the article/listen to the interview

Bridging digital divides: centring local leadership in humanitarian AI development – an online session as part of Humanitarian Networks and Partnerships Weeks (HNPW).

This session in March 2026 explored how AI is rapidly shaping humanitarian work, but local actors are still largely excluded from how these technologies are designed and governed, risking deeper inequalities. The panel discuss how AI can become a driver of localisation itself by embedding inclusion, ethics, and collaboration into humanitarian systems.

Watch the recording

Humanitarian AI podcast series: Global and African perspectives
A six-episode podcast series exploring the findings of our landmark 2025 AI in humanitarian action report, featuring global and African expert perspectives on ethics, governance, localisation, and implementation barriers.

Browse the collection

Thank you for visiting the HLA website, we are updating the site to reflect changes in our organisation. Contact us if you have any questions. Contact us

AI and human-in-the-loop in the humanitarian sector: an introductory guide from the HLA and Data Friendly Space

A group of people working at a desk with laptops, notebooks, and office supplies. The image promotes a guide on AI and human-in-the-loop approaches in the humanitarian sector by Humanitarian Leadership Academy and Data Friendly Space.

Confused by AI terms and not sure how they apply to humanitarian work? This practical guide with expertise from Data Friendly Space provides a beginner-friendly overview of “human-in-the-loop”.

This guide is designed to help humanitarians build human oversight into AI-supported work – and to support a culture of responsible AI use across teams and organisations.

It has been created as follow-up to the 2025-26 joint research initiative between the Humanitarian Leadership Academy and Data Friendly Space: Artificial intelligence in the humanitarian sector: mapping current practice and future potential.

Coming soon in Spanish and French!

Human-in-the-loop is only as strong as the culture and processes behind it.

Contact

This guide was created in May 2026. If you have any feedback or suggestions on this content, please contact:

Humanitarian Leadership Academy
info@humanitarian.academy

Data Friendly Space
hello@datafriendlyspace.org

Thank you for visiting the HLA website, we are updating the site to reflect changes in our organisation. Contact us if you have any questions. Contact us

April notes from the HLA Director | Two conferences, a few honest reflections

In this blog post, Pawel Mania, HLA Director, shares a short personal reflection from his attendance at two humanitarian convenings in April.

April has been a busy month. First, a small but sharp gathering in Copenhagen: Beyond the Bargain: Local Leadership in a New Global Reality.

Then Berlin, and the Humanitarian Congress: a much larger stage, hundreds of participants, but many of the same questions in the air.

Two very different events in scale. Enough in common to make me think.

Split image: Left shows five people standing beside framed art of a woman; right shows an audience in a theater, facing a presentation—capturing the spirit of April notes from the HLA Director.
Pictured: Pawel Mania at Beyond the Bargain: Local Leadership in a New Global Reality (left); Humanitarian Congress Berlin, April 2026 (right).

Who is in the room and why it matters

The most visible shift over recent years is who gets invited. Organisers are making a genuine effort to include local leaders and frontline responders in these conversations, and that is a real change from where we were.

But presence without power is not representation, it’s optics. The test is whether those voices shape the agenda, or simply validate what was already agreed before they arrived.

Tokenism is not always intentional. It is always felt. The same applies to women and youth leadership. The most affected are often the ones carrying the most clarity about how to respond. That is a signal about where trust, resources and genuine authority need to go.


A more honest picture of who we are

Many of you reading this were there long before any international organisation arrived, and you will be there long after. In most contexts, INGOs are a marginal actor in the life of a community – one layer within many systems that already exist: informal networks, mutual aid, community structures. The sooner we in the international sector are honest about that, the more genuinely useful we can become.

What I keep returning to is the gap between recommendations and commitments. We are very good at the first. Commitments require accountability. And accountability, like trust, is not something you produce in a conference room.

I still left both events with something I do not always expect when we reflect on the state of the humanitarian system(s): hope. Not the easy kind. The kind earned through honest conversation, through young leaders speaking with clarity and confidence, through organisers genuinely trying to do things differently.

The direction of travel is right. The work now is making sure we keep moving.

A man with short brown hair and trimmed beard, wearing a navy blazer and striped dress shirt, stands in front of a blue background with white letters and shapes, smiling slightly at the camera.
The direction of travel is right. The work now is making sure we keep moving.
Pawel Mania

Thank you for visiting the HLA website, we are updating the site to reflect changes in our organisation. Contact us if you have any questions. Contact us

Attention, algorithms and AI: How humanitarian organisations are rethinking communications in 2026

In the face of profound and rapid change, how are humanitarian organisations rethinking communications in 2026?

The humanitarian landscape is changing quickly – shaped by AI, funding pressures, and shifting audience expectations, raising critical questions about how organisations communicate, connect, and build trust.

In this episode, Amanda Hinkel-Mauceri, Director of Marketing and Communications at Humentum, and Gülsüm Özkaya, International Humanitarian Affairs Coordinator at IHH Humanitarian Relief Foundation join the HLA’s Ka Man Parkinson for a candid conversation on how communicators adapting to these challenges.

Tune in to hear open and honest peer reflections on what’s changing, what’s working, what’s not – and how communications can help shape the sector’s future, including:

Who this conversation is for

This episode is for humanitarian and nonprofit communications professionals looking to learn from peers, and for anyone working alongside communications teams, including those in programme, leadership, or AI and digital roles.

A promotional image for the Humanitarian Leadership Academy podcast, Attention, algorithms and AI: How are humanitarian organisations rethinking communications in 2026? Featuring Amanda Hinkel-Mauceri, Gülsüm Özkaya, and Ka Man Parkinson.
Listen to the conversation available on all major platforms including BuzzsproutSpotifyApple Podcasts and YouTube

Keywords: Humanitarian communications, nonprofit communications, AI adoption, humanitarian AI, AI ethics, human-in-the-loop, peer learning, community of practice, representation ethics, communications strategy, organisational readiness, knowledge sharing, AI imagery, informed consent, communications leadership, audience engagement, generative AI, local leadership.

Video preview

Watch a short clip from this episode

Three women smiling in a virtual meeting discuss,

Chapters

00:00: Chapter 1: Introduction
06:39: Chapter 2: What’s changing for communicators in the shifting landscape?
17:06: Chapter 3: AI slop, algorithms and the attention challenge
24:50: Chapter 4:  The human-in-the-loop – AI opportunities and challenges for communicators
32:27: Chapter 5: What do communicators need to get better at in the year ahead?
39:31: Chapter 6: What’s next – youth perspectives, new partnerships and approaches

The views and opinions expressed in our podcast are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of their organisations.

About the speakers

Amanda Hinkel-Mauceri

Amanda Hinkel-Mauceri is Director of Marketing & Communications at Humentum, where she leads the organization’s marketing, communications, and brand strategy and directs a dynamic team. With over a decade of expertise spanning growth marketing, global events, and crisis communications, Amanda has been instrumental in elevating Humentum’s visibility and impact across the global development and humanitarian sector. Since joining Humentum in 2018, Amanda has held roles in events and marketing before assuming the director position in 2023. She previously worked at The Phillips Collection, the United States Capitol, the National Building Museum, Americans for the Arts, MASS MoCA, and Great Minds. Amanda is based just outside of Washington, DC, United States. 

Gülsüm Özkaya 

Gülsüm Özkaya is an Istanbul-based International Humanitarian Affairs Coordinator at IHH Humanitarian Relief Foundation and a researcher with over three years of experience in the sector. Currently pursuing an MA in Strategic Communication Management, she focuses on international coordination and fostering strategic global partnerships. Previously, she led strategic communication and campaign design for the Children of Earth Association. Her academic work explores the integration of AI into humanitarian communication, specifically focusing on representation ethics and audience perception. Gülsüm is dedicated to bridging innovative technology with principled, ethical humanitarian action through cross-regional collaboration.

Ka Man Parkinson

Ka Man Parkinson is Communications Lead at the Humanitarian Leadership Academy, where she leads on global engagement and community building initiatives as part of the organisation’s convening strategy. Ka Man blends multimedia campaigns with learning and research – she produces and hosts the Fresh Humanitarian Perspectives podcast and HLA Webinar Series, building a culture of thought leadership. Her interdisciplinary background – spanning two decades of communications and marketing experience in the international education and nonprofit sectors, and an academic grounding in business management and IT – shapes her holistic and people-centred approach to her work. She initiated and co-leads the first global study to track how humanitarians are using AI in their work. Ka Man is based near Manchester, UK.

Episode transcript

This transcript has been generated using automated tools. It has been checked but minor errors or omissions may remain.

[Intro music]

[00:00] Chapter 1: Introduction

[Voiceover, Ka Man]: Welcome to Fresh Humanitarian Perspectives, the podcast brought to you by the Humanitarian Leadership Academy.

[Music changes]

[Voiceover, Gülsüm]:
In our sector, there’s not much you know, funding, especially after the cuts. So we need to find very creative and like the smart solutions to our problems.

[Voiceover, Ka Man]: Actually, this is the time to retain that real human decision-making — the human-in-the-loop, as we say — and make sure that’s at the heart of it.

[Voiceover, Amanda]:
I think we as comms professionals, we need to be honest with ourselves too, and say we need to get better at telling our story and making people care about the ‘so what’ and the ‘why’, so that it helps people realise what we’re doing is mission critical.

[Voiceover, Ka Man] How are humanitarian organisations rethinking communications in 2026?

I’m Ka Man Parkinson, Communications Lead here at the HLA and in today’s episode we’re exploring this very question through a candid, three-way conversation with peers. I’m joined by Amanda Hinkel-Mauceri from Humentum and Gülsüm Özkaya from IHH Humanitarian Relief Foundation.

This is an informal yet thoughtful and thought-provoking conversation, where we discuss the shifting communications landscape in 2026, what’s working for us from our vantage points and what’s not — from the rapid rise of AI and tools reshaping comms, to the growing pressure to communicate more impactfully and cut through the noise, while still protecting core principles and values such as ethics, dignity, and trust.

We hope this conversation will resonate with both communicators in the humanitarian field and the nonprofit space tackling common challenges as well as those in other roles who are curious what your comms colleagues may be working on or thinking about – hopefully sparking ideas for your next collaboration.

[Music ends]

Ka Man: So, Gülsüm and Amanda, welcome to the podcast!

Amanda: Thanks for having us!

Ka Man: I’m so excited to have this conversation with you today, especially because it’s about comms, which is obviously something that we’re all passionate about. So, to get started, would you like to briefly introduce yourself to our listeners? Let’s start with you, Gülsüm.

Gülsüm: I’m Gülsüm Özkaya. I’m working for an NGO based in Istanbul, Türkiye — IHH Humanitarian Relief Foundation. I’m working as an International Humanitarian Affairs Coordinator. And also, I’m pursuing my master’s degree on humanitarian communication. I am writing my thesis right now. It’s about how to use AI in humanitarian communication, and the perception of crisis-affected people while being represented in humanitarian communication products.

Ka Man: Thank you, Gülsüm. It’s so exciting for you to be here — especially as our organisations and our paths have crossed in different ways over the past year or so, so it’s nice to have this time to sit down and chat to you. So, Amanda, let’s come to you, would you like to introduce yourself?

Amanda: Yes, thank you. My name is Amanda, I’m the Director of Marketing and Communications for Humentum, and we’re a global nonprofit that helps other NGOs and nonprofits enhance their long-term resilience and navigate change through training, consulting, and membership as well. And I’ve been with Humentum for 8 years now overseeing marketing, comms, PR, video, graphic design — you name it — so a bit of everything, myself and my team manage. And I will say, in hearing a bit of both of your backgrounds, I didn’t necessarily expect to end up in comms, and I didn’t necessarily expect to end up in humanitarian global development either. And I actually came from an arts management background, and while I’ve been now in this sector for 10-plus years, it’s still a bit of a learning curve sometimes. So I’m so thrilled to just have a conversation with you both, and really just share what we’re hearing, what we’re seeing, and what’s working — and really also, what I think everyone’s interested in is what’s not working, and why, and what new ideas we can bring to the second half of 2026.

Ka Man: Thank you, Amanda. It’s so great to have this conversation with you today. So Humentum and the HLA have been partners — we’ve collaborated on courses on Kaya and other initiatives over the years, but our paths have only crossed the past year, I think, after we connected on LinkedIn. So it’s so nice to talk to a fellow comms professional. And we’ve had chats and Gülsüm and I have had chats, and there’s common ground. We’ve just discovered that we all like history, that was our favourite subject at school! [Laughs] We love learning about the past and how we can apply that to the present, as well as fond of literature as well. And Amanda, you were talking about, you weren’t expecting to be in comms, but here you are — you and I have had conversations about applying creativity into work and bringing in that perspective. So, although it might feel disparate in some senses, in other ways, it’s really holistic part of our lens and way of viewing the world, right?

Amanda: Yeah, absolutely. It’s been so fascinating because you know, arts and culture and comms are not far off at all, and the more you can bring in all those cross-disciplines, your messaging is stronger, your stories are stronger. It’s a really nice collaboration that makes a lot of sense when you think about it sometimes a bit more.

Ka Man: Absolutely, I love that. I’m really here for the whole interdisciplinary approach — that’s what I think comms actually has to evolve and become more like in the coming period, which we’ll talk about a bit more shortly.

So, the format of today’s podcast is going to be a little bit different. So because the three of us are comms professionals, it’s going to be a bit more of a dynamic conversation, so in turn, we’ll ask each other questions, so it’s not just me posing the questions.

[06:39] Chapter 2: What’s changing for communicators in the shifting landscape?

So much has changed for everyone in the system over the last — well, it’s been more than a year, but it’s been particularly acute since 2025 onwards. So can I turn to you first, Amanda, to ask: what’s changed for you within Humentum, and for you as the Director of Comms, what’s shifted?

Amanda: It’s been quite a rollercoaster, if you will, since 2025, when we had the USAID funding cuts. And Humentum, like many organisations, we reduced our structure and staffing footprint due to those cuts, so it really caused us to think about a lot of things differently. How can we be doing more with less? How can we be doing different things with less? What are the right things that we should be focusing on that best delivers on our mission and vision? And it was a really interesting timing and an interesting shove, because we were already thinking about an AI roadmap and implementation, but suddenly it really accelerated the thinking about how we can be using AI better at our organisation, and how we can be showing up with AI for our members and our clients. We did start with the foundational pieces of creating an AI way of working, an AI policy to get our staff aligned there. And then we started identifying the right tools, experimenting, testing, learning. It was a lot of working out loud, which is really fun when you get the space to do that, and just really see what works.

It was also over the past decade or so increasingly evident that we need to ensure that marketing and comms always have a seat at the table to ensure that you have that cross-collaboration. And I think something that might be top of mind for both of you too is: you can’t just bring comms in at the end. You really need to ensure that we are integral throughout the whole process — to be thinking about messaging, campaigns, channels, we’re showing up, where and when. So internal comms also shifted a lot within the past year, making sure we were showing up the way we needed to for our staff as well. But I’d be really interested to hear both of you — what is really changing, and what’s been working for you?

Gülsüm: Well, especially with the use of AI too much in our organisation as well, and I’m not only referring to IHH, the organisation I’m currently working at, but also my previous organisation YEÇED. These are both working with the teams that are a very young team and are just engaging with AI tools so quickly. What has changed, especially for the last year, it was so quick for creating content. We’re working in crisis areas and everything is changing so fast — but it was hard to follow these too fast changes before. Because I have like four years’ experience, and I’m referring back to 2022, the first year I started. But for the last year, it was too quick to create content. And also like engaging with other people, using their content as well — especially for the pictures from crisis areas. We are sending some messages, even to crisis-affected people to share with us and share on our social media accounts and other platforms.

So, especially for the external communication part, it was about creating quick content. But for internal communication, it’s also under the effect of AI, because right now it’s very easy to develop some tools with AI, and we are using it for internal communication as well. For example, our manager he’s developed with an AI person — he’s not a developer, but using an AI — for our internal communications problems, and now we are using that platform. So it was a quick answer to use for the internal communications, because other tools sometimes cannot address the problems let’s say of humanitarian workers or humanitarian organisations. So maybe, as humanitarian communicators, let’s say, we can focus on developing our own tools, our own solutions with AI.

Amanda: And I think that is so important, because we’re not operating in the same context as a public company, right? We’re dealing with so many sensitive areas, and I think we really need to ensure that what we’re putting into AI and building within AI aligns with our brand and our guidelines — because you need to have those set of guardrails, or I think it can do more damage.

Gülsüm: For sure, yeah, our standards are totally different than the other sectors. So we need our own standards which means we need our own standards on AI as well — so even for the use of tools, creating content, etc. It’s important for us to engage in AI in that point, I think.

Ka Man: I love hearing this, because as you know I have a particular interest in AI. I haven’t guided you in this way to talk about AI [laughs] — it’s just naturally emerged as a priority for you. And that reflects the interest and adoption across the sector, where we found in our recent research with Data Friendly Space that three-quarters of humanitarians are using AI regularly to support their work. But there’s low levels of organisational readiness across the board, including policies for example and training. So it’s actually really interesting for me to hear that actually as organisations, you’re trying to find a way forward but not in isolation — you’re trying to operationalise that more widely across teams, and I think that reflects the stage that a lot of organisations are at.

But I think, crucially, for communicators, we’re kind of leading the way in a sense — because even though people might not necessarily think of comms straight away when you think about humanitarian AI – you might be thinking of more operational or programmatic applications, MEAL for example, or needs assessment, actually because comms and design, and marketing have actually been the first areas in all sectors to be really adopting AI. Actually, I think we’re quite an important contingent to actually reflect back lessons learned, and to share that, and encourage that open conversation and those lessons learned for other teams.

Amanda: And one tangible example I can share — and Ka Man, I think I talked to you about this a bit: I was building an AI agent in Copilot that was trained on our brand guidelines and messaging, which we then rolled out to a small group of staff members to test and trial, see does this help with building content? Does it help generate strategic ideas, or be that thought partner? And it hasn’t really been working the way I anticipated, to be very frank. I think it takes time to figure that out, figure out what’s working and what’s not, and to share that out loud. Because I know, Gülsüm, you’re working on Claude, right? And that’s really where I’m interested in exploring next — maybe a skills-based agent in Claude is the better option. But really understanding what your organisation needs, what we need as comms teams, to help us move forward and what the rest of the organisation needs. What our comms teams needs and what the rest of the organisations needs.

But it did give us ideas of— oh, could this work for our programme teams in different ways? Could this work for our business development teams in different ways? So there are always rays of sunshine, if you will, when things fail and don’t quite work out, and I think sharing those lessons learned out loud to inspire other comms teams to test and trial within their own parameters to see.

Gülsüm: I totally agree with you. Well, that’s why I think we need to keep trying, I guess. And also, especially for the youth – I don’t know who is describing yourself as young or not [laughs] I’m not saying anything about this, but of course like maybe as younger generations, maybe we need to focus more on creating tools and developing maybe with Claude you mentioned and other tools as well. Because when we realise how much it makes everything easier and faster, I think it will just make a huge difference in the sector as well. In our sector, there’s not much funding, especially after the cuts. So we need to find very creative and smart solutions to our problems. That’s why we need to focus on the specific problem and create our own solution on this.
 
[17:06] Chapter 3: AI slop, algorithms and the attention challenge

Amanda: Yes, and I think the flip side of the rise of AI is also the rise of AI slop. There’s just a lot more content out there, a lot more for our audiences to sift through. So where are you finding it hardest to cut through the noise right now? Is it with younger audience, is it supporters, partners, donors, funders?

Gülsüm: Well, actually, it’s not directly from my own organisation’s experience, but in general — because I have lots of friends in the sector and we are talking frequently about this. The hardest thing is mostly explaining our solutions to the older generation of managers. It might be an easy solution, or a content idea, that they could expand it more. But the sector is not always that welcoming to AI and these kinds of new ideas. You see. Not the donor side, of course actually might also be the donor side a little bit, because among donors it’s not always a young group of people in the sector.

Sometimes it is a hard part to deal with. I’d like to give an example about this: for a child protection project we had involving child sponsorship, something like this, we had donors but we didn’t want to share real pictures of the children with the donors for the child protection, and we created AI-generated versions of pictures of the children and shared with the donors. Mostly, it sounds like a creative idea for the younger people, they loved the idea and were okay with it, but older generation donors are not very welcoming of this solution — because if they’re not engaging with AI in their own personal lives, these kinds of AI-based solutions are not seen like a good way to solve problems. So that might be the hard way to solve the problems.

Amanda: Yeah, that’s such a good example — meeting them where they are. Ka Man, what are you seeing?

Ka Man: You know, it’s so interesting hearing you both speak, because actually you both point to something that’s really hard for us in communications because the landscape is shifting, and expectations are shifting so rapidly. Maybe going back 10, 15 years ago, we had a sort of clearer idea of what appeals to which audiences and which channels we’ll use to reach them, and developing a marketing plan or a comms plan was a bit more of a straightforward task. But social media algorithms are really working against us [laughs].

I’ve found that in the last year or so, LinkedIn especially — which is one of our major channels and we still get a huge amount of our audience from there and engagement — the algorithm counts against us I think in a non-profit capacity. Our messaging isn’t “here’s top 5 ways to, you know, maximise your return on investment.” [laughs] It’s very different messaging, which these platforms might not necessarily prioritise. So it’s working with that. And then, as Gülsüm has just mentioned, it’s the changing expectations of your audiences — so that might be generational, or it might be the purpose. So as comms professionals, I feel it’s really hard for us to develop a cohesive plan that you don’t have to constantly refine and iterate, which we do, but with time constraints it can be hard to do that. In an ideal world, we’d have a big team, we’d be doing A/B split tests and we’d be doing all sorts of things to test that, but in the operational realities that we face, we don’t have that luxury necessarily. So I think being strategic, being intentional, but also having that flexibility to adapt is absolutely essential to navigate this— but it’s hard [laughs], it’s hard, because we’ve only got one pair of hands and 24 hours in a day. So yeah, I think that’s one of the things that one of the biggest challenges right now.

Amanda: And there’s so many nonprofits doing so much incredible work. So how are you cutting through the noise? How do you ensure your messaging is landing? I think it’s really about understanding your target audience, knowing what they need to hear from you, where their mindset is at. But I think we as comms professionals need to be honest with ourselves too, and say we need to get better at telling our story and making people care about the “so what” and the “why,” so that it helps people realise what we’re doing is mission critical and affects your daily life.

And I was looking at some research done by a university in the US, and Candid recently highlighted it as well, which said that only 5.4% of Americans say they use nonprofits. And even in that context, that’s shockingly low, right? But it also reflected that 4 out of 5 Americans visited a local park, a rec centre, a museum, a zoo — and many people didn’t realise that those are nonprofits. So how can we as comms professionals, one, cut through the noise that connects with our audience, and two, help them understand the why behind it and why these things matter, especially in our current environment?

Ka Man: Yeah, that’s so true. You know, you made me think about — in January, the team and I took part in an Amazon Web Services hackathon. It was a 3-day hackathon and we had to pitch at the end — we only had five minutes, and we had to just give an elevator pitch essentially for why our prototype should be funded and why this matters. And normally when I’m presenting to audiences, I’m presenting to the humanitarian sector. And actually that was a real challenge, because I’m like, of course humanitarianism matters, humanitarian action matters, locally-led humanitarian action really matters — but to actually get across into one minute or less, when I’m alongside charities who are working in healthcare and education — those are universal and resonate immediately because we all have the experience of a child learning to read, or supporting someone with health challenges. I think we in the sector need to maybe take a step outside of our beliefs and you know, what we think cuts through, and evaluate with a fresh perspective, and a bit of soul-searching to get to: why are we here? What do we stand for? And so what? Why should a funder care? Why should a partner care? And it’s not easy, because obviously we all care, but we need to make that argument stronger and more compelling.

[24:50] Chapter 4:  The human-in-the-loop – AI opportunities and challenges for communicators

Amanda: Absolutely. I know, Gülsüm, you’re thinking about what’s working and what’s not. Do you have any key lessons that have really made a difference for you, or any things that really haven’t worked — thinking about AI or talking to different audiences at different generational levels? What are you seeing that’s worked?

Gülsüm: Well, actually, I’d like to mention my here my project because it’s changing my perception on what’s worked and what’s not especially for humanitarian communication. And what I mean by project is actually my thesis. I’m conducting interviews with crisis-affected people and asking: do you prefer to be represented by AI, or do you prefer to do real pictures of you, your community, your area, your city?
I always assumed that most people would choose AI because they don’t want to see themselves or their families depicted in a crisis situation. But most of the interviewees actually expressed that they would like to see real pictures from crisis areas — even their own pictures — because they want people to understand that the crisis is real.

At that point, I really changed my idea, because I used to think that AI was the best solution on this. But after these interviews, I started to understand that the perceptions of crisis-affected people or beneficiaries might be totally different. So while we are creating solutions with AI and other tools, we of course need to get the input of beneficiary groups — not just donors or humanitarian communicators or others. For the last year, that has been my biggest learning lesson.

And also, authentication of content — because there is lots of communication that we are engaging as humanitarian communicators, we engage with lots of content from news sources, directly from content creators in crisis-affected areas, and local partners we have in the crisis areas. There’s always a flow of content, but authentication directly affects our relationships with donors, networks, and partners. That’s also a key issue for me this year. That’s why I’m working on a humanitarian AI policy for my previous organisation — because these humanitarian AI policies, if we can’t create these immediately, new problems adding on this. Especially in child protection and related protection areas, I think we all need to focus on this before the new challenges are born.

Amanda: So fascinating. I love the really interesting work you’re getting to focus on. And for me, it’s that reminder that we need to be centring communities and the people that we serve, involving them in data collection and decision-making — because we don’t want just a top-down solution. We want to understand how they want to be portrayed, and for me that comes back to building that trust and building relationships. And I think that’s something that makes a real difference especially this year. And I know, Ka Man, you’ve been thinking about that piece especially — building those relationships.

Ka Man: Yeah, absolutely. You make such great points both of you. Yeah, open communication and trust-based relationships are so critical across the board. And Gülsüm, your research is so thought-provoking — because from a personal perspective I think, of course real photos, authentic imagery is preferable. But then actually your research is showing that actually, agency and choice is the central decider. So there is no one-size-fits-all, and that listening is really key.

Gülsüm: There’s another point here I guess, because sometimes even when crisis-affected people choose something they think is more beneficial for them, but humanitarian communicators have to protect their dignity even if they choose something else. For example, in a crisis area, a woman let’s say, might say, “You can take a picture of me if you give me some cash or just some help, or any other something.” You see, it’s a crisis affected context, they might say something like that. But the decision of whether to actually share that picture belongs to the humanitarian communicator, right. So even though the person, the crisis-affected person, choose the normal picture or something to be shared to call people for donation, the humanitarian communicator still has to protect their dignity, even if they have permission from them.

And also for children as well — children have no idea for AI or normal pictures or real pictures sharing on social media or different platforms. Humanitarian communicators have to protect their rights and their dignity, you know.

Ka Man: Gosh, you really highlight the complexity there — so, it’s not just informed consent, but whether the whole situation is ethical. That speaks to the whole theme of: whether we’re under pressure, we have to put that time and really think through the processes, even with AI speeding things up and giving us back some time, we can’t, you know, we need to be diligent in our processes. That really speaks to the importance of that with that really tangible example there.

Gülsüm: Yeah.

[32:27] Chapter 5: What do communicators need to get better at in the year ahead?

Amanda: So what do you think is going to be really important — or even critical — as we look to the second half of 2026 and into 2027 for comms professionals? What are you all seeing? Do we need to get better at something? Is there something we need to let go? We like to say at Humentum: what do you need to start, and what do you need to stop?

Gülsüm: I think as long as we have standards on this and we continue to talk and discuss about it more, everything will get better situation I think — because there are lots of tools that make everything easier and faster, and there are lots of benefits for crisis-affected people, beneficiaries, donors, and humanitarian professionals. But of course, as long as we are realising the potential problems and risks of AI and humanitarian communication in general, I think everything will improve. That’s my personal point of view — I always think things will get better, I think, inshallah. It’s my personal point of view, I always think things will be better! [laughs] But for humanitarian AI specifically, I think we need to discuss more about our standards and humanitarian AI policies.

Ka Man: Yeah, I agree. From my perspective, there are a couple of things I think we need to get better at, I’d like to point to a couple of things. Advocating for communications. I know it’s quite ironic to say that on a podcast about communications [laughs], but as we’ve gone through this conversation, it’s really highlighted to me how, in the age of AI and efficiency and the pressure to do more with less, comms can be seen as something maybe not essential. But actually, this is the time to retain that real human decision-making — the human-in-the-loop, as we say — and make sure that’s at the heart of it. Because, as Gülsüm has just talked about with that really powerful example, all the intricacies and nuances of deciding what type of imagery to use in comms — an agent isn’t going to be able to make those kinds of decisions. Not yet. Maybe in the future, but not yet. So I think advocating for communications, advocating for our role and our strategic steer, and critically helping the organisation to articulate why we matter and why people should support us and our mission.

And then secondly — because of all the pressures we face and you know, everyone showing up and doing the best they can every day — I think we have to really try to maintain intentionality in everything we do. Whether that’s an individual task, whether it’s the relationships we need to nurture with colleagues, with our broader network, with funders, and so on. I think we really need to put care and time into that. But that’s not easy with how thinly we are stretched, but I think we need that time and space to give ourselves and our colleagues and others permission to do that.

And on that point — I read on LinkedIn recently, someone called Jennifer Lentfer posted a phrase I found really interesting. She said the nonprofit sector has what she called a “bias for action,” which can be a positive thing, right, because that’s what we’re here for – action. But it can be detrimental because it can lead to knee-jerk reactions or short-term approaches that can actually do more harm than good. She didn’t go as far as to say that necessarily but that’s the overall sentiment. But I thought that’s a really crucial and critical thing to consider as we navigate this time, and communications can be central to that. Open, honest, and candid communications — and that’s where we as communicators can really advocate for that, beyond just promotion or direct communications externally, but with everyone in our network. So yeah, I think we’re probably doing quite well with what we have, but you know, just being conscious of all that will be really valuable in the year ahead.

Amanda: That’s really fascinating, and I’m seeing something slightly different in the moving from talk to action — because what we’re seeing at Humentum is a lot of organisations and leaders still feeling stuck. The old system, the old way of funding and implementing, is gone. So it’s fascinating that that’s person’s reflecting on seeing too much action, and maybe we’re just not quite there yet — but I’m confident and really believe we’re all moving in the right direction. It takes all of us to be doing that.

Ka Man: That resonates 100%. Yes, you need to find somewhere between paralysis — because you don’t know the way forward and the actions and knee-jerk reactions. There has to be intentional action, and that’s so hard because there are so many dependencies we’re all navigating, not least funding. So, I think there’s more clarity now about where we want to be, but how we unlock those solutions now — including funding — is the missing puzzle piece in a lot of our conundrum, I’d say. So yes, collective action I see as the way forward, in all its forms, small ways and big ways. So, conversations like this, that’s part of it — that honesty and that transparency.

[39:31] Chapter 6: What’s next – youth perspectives, new partnerships and approaches

Amanda: And lastly, something else I’ve been thinking about and would love to hear your perspectives — what’s in our sphere of control, and how can we bring in other experts, including unconventional ones? Something I see unfolding in the social media ecosystem is increased partnerships with influencers. Some organisations and nonprofits and NGOs are starting to experiment with what those partnerships can look like. I firmly believe that’s another avenue that, if it’s right for your target audience, should continue to be explored — in the right context, with the right messaging, in the right channel. Working with those partnerships can unlock a whole new audience that may have been untapped, and allows unconventional ideas and experts in their own way to elevate our expertise and break through the noise. Have you all been seeing anything like that or is it way off what you’re hearing?

Ka Man: I think it’s so interesting — and Gülsüm, I know you’ll have something to say about this because you’ve been talking to a lot of young people, haven’t you, youth leadership, how they want to bring their energy, ideas, and perspectives and skills to the sector, but there aren’t necessarily the structural opportunities available. So I’ll bring you in in a sec to hear more from you on that. And from my perspective, there are people out there like MrBeast, right, who is doing collaborations with more formal organisations. It might jar for certain types, but we have to be receptive to new ideas and new approaches. So yeah, I think it’s definitely think we should be open to exploring. And also, when you look at some organisations across the nonprofit – cultural sector actually I think is quite good at this. When you see someone younger at the helm of social media, doing reels, you know, just bringing that fresh energy and that engagement — it’s really great to see, I love to see it! And I think the humanitarian sector needs that injection of ideas and energy.

Gülsüm: Oh, I think so. And actually based on the country, it’s changing — as far as I can see, there are quite a lot of young humanitarians in Türkiye as well. But for other countries, it’s also discussing what the main problems are for young humanitarians — maybe it’s finding the right place in the sector for themselves, or even cannot even get a seat in the sector at all, with doors closed to them. Maybe we can discuss that more with young humanitarians as well — as an upcoming episode ideas [laughs].

Ka Man: Yes, absolutely, I love it, I love it! And actually at the HLA, my colleagues are working on a youth leadership series, so stay tuned for that coming soon.

Oh, what a fantastic conversation — I really love this. It’s so energising to hear from you both, and I love the perspectives that you bring. We’ll organise another conversation for sure, but I just want to say thank you. Do you have any final words to share before we wrap up today?

Gülsüm: Next time, a face-to-face conversation, inshallah!

Ka Man: Yes, I would love that, I’d love that! Istanbul, right, we’ll come to Istanbul! [laughs]

Gülsüm: Yes, in Istanbul, please!

Ka Man: I’ve never been, so I’d love for you to show me around [laughs].

Gülsüm: [Laughs] You’re most welcome.

Amanda: Kudos to you, Ka Man, for bringing us together. It’s so fascinating to have conversations across geographies — we each sit in different seats, and to hear what you all are thinking about is just informing my work so much more. I’m so excited to go back and share with my team what you all are thinking about and how we can apply things differently. And I think that’s when the best ideas form — when we’re knowledge sharing, when we’re seeing those successes and those not-so-successes. It really helps us become better communicators and better leaders, to share out the right messaging for the right target audience, to really make a difference and continue to move us forward.

Ka Man: Absolutely. Gülsüm actually had the brilliant idea of, when we first met, to actually start up a humanitarian communications community of practice — starting off with an informal one. So that’s what this is, really, isn’t it? [laughs] It’s a very informal community of practice. If any funders are listening to this and want to help us scale this so that we can support humanitarian communicators, we’d be very receptive to hearing from you [laughs]. I do think it’s really invaluable. Yes, so Gülsüm, do you have any final words to share?

Gülsüm: Well, thank you so much for having us. It was a great conversation for me, because it’s important to discuss this together — we cannot imagine what’s coming in terms of problems and risks. And we can solve them by discussing among ourselves, and I really appreciated what Amanda is working on and you are also doing. So it was a great opportunity for me as you are experienced comms professionals. So I hope that we keep the discussion, and hope that there might be even a little benefit for anyone who is listening to this. I will be so happy about this. So let’s see how much more we can do for this sector and all the people we are trying to reach.

Ka Man: Brilliant, thank you so much. So, Gülsüm Özkaya and Amanda Hinkel-Mauceri, thank you very much for joining us for today’s episode of Fresh Humanitarian Perspectives from the Humanitarian Leadership Academy.

Amanda: Thank you so much.

Gülsüm: Thank you.

[Music]

Share the conversation

Follow Fresh Humanitarian Perspectives on your favourite podcast platform. Please consider leaving a review and sharing this episode with someone who may find it of interest. We welcome your feedback – please email info@humanitarian.academy

Links to related content highlighted in the podcast conversation:

Opinion | Should we use AI-generated imagery in humanitarian communications? Spotlight on research by Gülsüm Özkaya
Read more about Gülsüm’s research into AI-generated imagery in humanitarian communications. Read

Opinion | How are humanitarians using AI in 2026? The case for governance and local leadership by Ka Man Parkinson
Reflection on the latest phase of the AI research from the HLA conducted in partnership with Data Friendly Space. Read

Bridging digital divides: centring local leadership in humanitarian AI development
HNPW March 2026 online session featuring panellists including Gülsüm Özkaya and Ka Man Parkinson. Watch

From barriers to breakthroughs: HLA at the AWS hackathon 2026
This news article highlights the HLA team’s participation in the AWS Breaking Barriers Challenge. Read

Episode produced by Ka Man Parkinson, April 2026.

Thank you for visiting the HLA website, we are updating the site to reflect changes in our organisation. Contact us if you have any questions. Contact us

[AR] The road is not easy… but it is possible | ليس الطريق سهلاً… لكنه ممكن

How can local leaders overcome systemic barriers to drive meaningful humanitarian change?

“We don’t have a problem with ambition…the problem is with opportunities.” – Ali Al Mokdad

In this Arabic-language episode of the Fresh Humanitarian Perspectives podcast, Faisal Mislit, Crisis Response Project Lead at the Humanitarian Leadership Academy (HLA), hosts Ali Al Mokdad, Senior Strategic Leader, for an honest conversation about leading in complex humanitarian contexts. Both have navigated the barriers that so often hold back local talent — the wrong passport, the wrong university, the wrong nationality — and both have come out the other side with hard-won lessons to share.

From personal stories of frustration, rejection, and breakthrough moments, they explore what it really takes to grow as a local leader, why ambition alone is never enough, and how individuals and organisations can do better.

Audio in Arabic. English and Arabic transcripts available.

Read an English language companion blog post based on this podcast episode

View the Arabic version of this webpage

Faisal Mislit

Faisal Mislit is a humanitarian professional with over a decade of experience working across crisis and development contexts in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. As Crisis Response Project Lead with the Humanitarian Leadership Academy, he leads initiatives that strengthen locally led humanitarian action through leadership development, organisational coaching, and strategic partnerships. His work focuses on empowering local actors, fostering innovation, and translating global frameworks into practical, community-driven solutions that deliver sustainable impact in complex and fragile environments.

Ali Al Mokdad: Senior Strategic Leader

Ali Al Mokdad is a senior leader specializing in global impact operations, governance reform, and humanitarian diplomacy, with operational experience across the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and Europe.

Ali Al Mokdad has a track record of leading organizational investments, including organizational transformation and development, as well as digital transformation. He has also published work on inclusive and innovative governance, as well as science and humanitarian diplomacy, in Europe, the United Arab Emirates, and the United States.

Transcript in English

Podcast transcript 

This transcript and translation have been produced using automated tools. It has been checked but minor errors or omissions may remain. 

Faisal Mislit: Welcome everyone, I’m Faisal Mislit. I’m delighted to be with you today in this episode where we discuss a very important topic: leadership in complex humanitarian contexts. At the Humanitarian Leadership Academy (HLA), which is part of Save the Children, we work to accelerate humanitarian work based on local leadership. This is a critical topic because we believe that local leaders are best positioned to understand their challenges and respond to them effectively and sustainably.

Today’s conversation will certainly not be purely theoretical. We will try to understand how leadership is actually practiced on the ground, especially in environments full of challenges and constraints.

Today I am honored and very pleased to host Professor Ali Al Mokdad, one of the experts in this field, to engage in this dialogue together. Welcome, Professor Ali — we’ll give you the floor as well. Please go ahead.

Ali Al Mokdad: Hello and thank you very much for having me. I’m really happy that we can have this discussion and talk about these topics, because I feel it is very, very important to do so. At the same time, there aren’t many discussions on this topic in Arabic, so this will be a great opportunity to share this knowledge and these experiences together. As we said before recording, let’s have fun and enjoy this conversation.

Faisal Mislit: Absolutely. Thank you, Professor Ali — it’s certainly a wonderful opportunity. As I mentioned, we in this field are opening a new space for Arabic-speaking audiences. We always see content in English or other languages translated into Arabic, but today we’ll do the opposite — we’ll speak in Arabic from the start, inshallah.

Your experience is vast and your field is excellent — we’ll try to benefit from our conversation today. Through your long experience, the youth and local leaders in our regions — thinking of the Middle East, North Africa, Arabic speakers everywhere, or those living in difficult environments — face certain challenges influenced by factors like unequal opportunities and others. Could you share some observations from your experience?

Ali Al Mokdad: Before I get into the challenges facing young people, I want to say a bit about my background so that listeners understand where I’m coming from. I was born in Syria, in a small village in the south. Like most villages in the Middle East, there was no internet and access to services was very limited. In the area where I grew up, there was only one main road. I didn’t have access to global experiences or knowledge, and I remember having to walk about an hour and a half to two hours just to get to school.

After that I moved and started working and volunteering. I spent more than a year volunteering with local organizations and volunteer teams. My main goal was simply to help the people around me — I wasn’t even thinking that people could make a career out of it. From there I started to develop professionally.

But then I started facing challenges. For example, the work was in English, and I was embarrassed to speak English because I was afraid to use technical terminology. Every time I spoke English, someone would correct me, so I developed a kind of fear. Later, when I started working with international organizations in Syria, I faced further challenges: are you international or national staff? Are you a manager or technical staff? All these distinctions were foreign to me. As I continued to grow step by step as a national staff member, new challenges kept emerging: “Where did you study? What’s your specialization? What university did you attend?” I started hearing names of foreign universities I had never heard of, as if they were the only valid standard. After that I took on assignments in other countries — I wasn’t only in the Middle East, but also in Africa, Asia, and Europe. I moved from Syria to Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, the UAE, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Sudan, Kenya, Nigeria, and then to Europe, eventually taking on responsibility for more than forty countries. But by that point new challenges arose: what passport do you have? Can you travel? Can you get a visa? I mention all of this simply to say that I lived these problems myself — but let me get back to your question.

What I noticed, especially in the Middle East, is that we don’t have a problem with ambition. Everywhere I’ve been — cities, rural areas, small villages — everyone has ambition. But the problem is with opportunities. The second challenge I observed is that starting points in life are different. The starting point for young people is often tied to geographic location — whether they’re in a village, a city, or a capital — or to their economic situation, since some people carry the responsibility of supporting their families while others don’t. There are social classes, and in terms of education, some managed to go to university and others didn’t. So starting points are genuinely unequal.

The second issue I found is that weak policies within organizations and institutions create even bigger obstacles. Instead of young people focusing on developing themselves and reaching their ambitions, they get distracted by simple logistical problems — two hours of travel just to get somewhere, standing in queues, dealing with paperwork, visa issues — things a person shouldn’t even have to think about. All of this hinders growth. In summary, the chaos around opportunities, equality, and institutions has become part of everyday life for youth in the Middle East. They carry an extra burden of navigating this chaos instead of focusing on their future and building their lives.

Faisal Mislit: Exactly. We can certainly talk about a complex reality — upbringing, access, problems, and challenges. Those listening to us now may be facing the same issues — passports, location, identity, and the chaos you described. Systems and contexts sometimes impose unfair restrictions on growth and opportunity. The problem, as you said, is not in people’s capabilities — it’s in access to opportunities. Do you agree?

Ali Al Mokdad: Let me give you a quick example. When I was national staff in Syria, they formed a technical team at my organization and an international staff member joined us. Before even getting to know us or understanding what each person does, the first thing he did was ask everyone what they had studied. When he got to me, I explained my work, my trainings, and my experience. He said: “No, the person doing your job needs a master’s degree from such-and-such university.” First of all, that program didn’t even exist in the country. Second, I was already doing the job effectively. Third, how were those credentials even relevant? Unfortunately, he removed me from the technical team. Access to that specific university or master’s degree suddenly became a barrier to my professional development — not because I lacked the experience, skill, or knowledge, but because an arbitrary standard was suddenly imposed. And beyond education, you encounter the same thing with visas — you need a certain nationality or residency to do certain work. Suddenly you find all these obstacles based simply on the language you speak, the place you were born, and the environment you grew up in. Instead of institutions supporting and developing you, they place all these standards which, in my view, are all assumptions — because on the ground, the reality is completely different.

Faisal Mislit: I completely agree. We’re talking about the Middle East, North Africa, and surrounding countries affected by complex environments. If you look at history, you see these crises and the organizational responses that have happened over many years — yet the number of people from this region who reach senior positions remains disproportionately small. The problem is not in capabilities. One excellent example you raised is education — the academic programs relevant to this field may simply not exist here. My own background is in engineering; others come with medical or doctoral backgrounds and join organizations working in completely different areas. So you end up working on two parallel tracks: building experience in the field while also going back to find formal qualifications that you don’t actually need in practice. I also want to share something from our current work. Under HLA, I manage a project in 6 countries including Iraq, Myanmar, Nigeria, South Sudan, Ethiopia, and the Congo. Local partners there sometimes face even greater challenges than international staff. For example, in Myanmar, the preference is for people who speak the local language. I shouldn’t force people in that country to learn another language just to access opportunities — the work should go the other way. We believe leadership should come from within, from local people. That’s one example. You raised an excellent point about people, barriers, and education — something that genuinely confronts so many people.

Can we move to the next point, Professor Ali? The conversation is excellent and time is passing quickly. Earlier we were talking about people who have left organizations or left this field entirely — feelings of frustration, loss of hope. To be honest, not everything is rosy. Some people apply for long periods, some want to grow but face barriers in being accepted if they lack the right connections. How do you see these challenges affecting young people and local leaders in terms of their self-confidence, ambitions, and hope?

Ali Al Mokdad: From my personal experience, and especially having worked with many talented people across all those countries, I felt that frustration, psychological pressure, and exhaustion — to the point where it physically affects you and your relationships with family and friends — has become part of these challenges we are living.

Of course there are many dimensions to this. If you’re responsible for a family, the pressures multiply. If you’re working in your own country, you’re trying to operate in a place that may already be in a catastrophic state. If you’re in another country, your home situation is unstable while you’re working somewhere equally unstable. Throughout all my years — working across 30+ countries and managing programs, operations, and organizations — the challenges kept repeating, just in different forms. Even when I reached headquarters and regional offices, they were still there. I feel it has become part of our journey in this field. But the most important thing with these challenges is that you are able to sit with them — to live through that exhaustion or frustration, think about it, and work on it so it doesn’t keep recurring. I’ve noticed that some problems, if not properly addressed, come back in a different form, in a different place, again and again. It’s better to confront them and think about how to deal with them. What genuinely saddens me is that young people in the Middle East, because of all these challenges, find every door closing on them repeatedly — a second time, a third time, a tenth time.

Faisal Mislit: That’s true.

Ali Al Mokdad: Their hope that things will change diminishes greatly, and so does their capacity for reflection — and I consider that dangerous. It’s very important that these things — psychological exhaustion, frustration, pressure, and growing responsibilities — which often in the Middle East also have material and social repercussions, are things one must genuinely sit with and think through.

Faisal Mislit: Exactly. And we can build on that last point — despite these problems, we see different models of people who managed to cross these challenges. They could be challenges that Faisal or Ali faced, or that those listening now are facing. Some people broke through, persevered, and kept their hope alive. Someone once asked me: “How do I reach the level that some people have reached? I have the ability, I have the language, I’ve learned — but with 7 years of experience, I’m sitting at home.” What distinguishes those who persevered and reached that place? I’d love to hear your take.

Ali Al Mokdad: I could talk about this topic for hours. But there’s one thing I’ve noticed that’s common among all these people: ambition alone — everyone knows — is not enough.

Faisal Mislit: True.

Ali Al Mokdad: You need a strategy. You need to be able to think: this is my goal — what are the concrete steps I can take to get there? I’ve noticed a clear difference in people — especially administrators and managers I’ve met at very high levels, whether in companies, non-profits, or international organizations. When people talk about steps to take, they usually think from one to ten — what do I need to do? But what I’ve noticed distinguishes people who’ve reached a high level is actually what happens from zero to one. From one to ten, I can tell you the standard things: do online training, read this manual, work with certain people — everyone knows those. But the real key is from zero to one. What does that mean? It means sitting with yourself — working with three versions of yourself: your past self, examining the challenges you went through, the things you worked on, the things you were criticized for; your present self, assessing your current challenges, opportunities, and responsibilities; and your future self, defining your goal and your strategy. Think of it like a personal council where you sit with all three versions and think through the details. 

Practically speaking — if my future goal is a management position, or focusing on my family, or writing a book — what are the one, two, three, four things I need to do in the present? What tactics do I have available right now? That’s why ambition alone isn’t enough — you need a strategy. The big challenge you’ll also face is assumptions. In our societies especially, everyone has advice and assumptions to offer. You need to distinguish between what is an assumption and what is reality. For example, one very common assumption in humanitarian and development work is that you need a strong passport or strong residency to work in different countries. I consider that an assumption — because I’ve worked in 30+ countries and managed 40 countries with only one passport. Another assumption is that you need a specific degree or master’s from a particular institution. That’s also largely an assumption — I eventually went ahead and completed two master’s degrees and set a record for the number of professional trainings completed, and I came to realize that most of those credentials were assumptions, while the experience gained on the ground was worth far more. You need to be able to distinguish between assumption and reality. And one more thing I notice a lot with young people just starting out: they use hope as a substitute for strategy — “things will get better, things will change.” Hope is important, but hope alone is not a strategy. You can’t simply wait for things to improve without taking concrete steps and working on them.

Faisal Mislit: Exactly — excellent. At the heart of this: as a person, you are responsible for the striving, not the result. What matters is that you actively pursue your goal. And your last point is spot on — waiting for hope means you’re in a waiting queue, not moving forward. The points you raised about assumptions — or what I’d call imaginary challenges — are very important. I’m already dealing with real challenges like passport restrictions and travel barriers. Then someone else layers additional hypothetical obstacles on top: “You’re from the Middle East, you can’t work in the UK, or Denmark, or Indonesia.” Why? “Because of your passport.” And automatically you might feel discouraged. We’ve all been through this. That frustration could cost you real opportunities. The important thing is: you are responsible for the striving, regardless of today’s challenges. Ali Al Mokdad, from a small village in Syria, now works at a major level. Faisal, from a small village in Iraq, now works in the UK. We faced the same challenges. What we’re sharing now is not discouraging — on the contrary, we’re trying to build a spirit of perseverance and continued effort.

We’ve shared some very real things today, and that’s the purpose. Before we move on — do you have a real story you’d like to share, without names, of someone who went through these challenges but overcame them?

Ali Al Mokdad: Two stories come to mind. First, my own. Early in my career I was very, very frustrated. My country was at war, the economic situation was terrible, I was far from my family, working in a field where I didn’t feel I was learning — and most organizations, unfortunately, don’t invest in their staff. I felt no opportunities were coming my way, so I decided to resign. I sent the email to everyone — I was very frustrated and wanted people to know: nothing is being learned here, there’s discrimination, and I was also young. Everything at once.

Faisal Mislit: I see.

Ali Al Mokdad: As I was leaving the office, the organization’s director called me and said: “Sit down, let’s talk.” My first reaction was almost a shock — the director spoke English, and I was very anxious about speaking English. I knew it, but I was afraid people would correct me or think I couldn’t express myself properly. I sat there with hands between my knees, very nervous. She asked one question: “Why are you resigning?” I said: “I’m not learning anything.” She said one sentence that changed my entire life: “Who is stopping you from learning?” At that moment I didn’t fully understand what she meant. She told me there are things available online — books, articles, learning resources, videos. I had always assumed my organization would be the one to train me. When I went home that evening — imagine that moment of frustration, leaving work, everything weighing on me — that thought hit me: maybe I should look at what’s actually available online. This was more than thirteen or fourteen years ago. I suddenly discovered websites like Disaster Ready, Kaya, and Global Health. When I started exploring them, it felt like finding a treasure.

I started learning — at that time I was a senior officer — about project management, project lifecycle, operations management, disaster management, international law, humanitarian law, gender-based violence, psychosocial support. That moment took me more than a month of intensive study, but my thinking completely changed. I understood that I needed to take ownership of my goal and my development. The message I want to convey is: don’t wait for your organization to develop you — take responsibility for your own growth and start working on it. The second story is about someone I deeply admire, whose journey feels very similar to ours. He was born in Sudan and started the same way — as a volunteer, then small positions, in a completely different specialization, before entering humanitarian work. He was told he needed a master’s, specific training, and all the rest. He faced all the same problems. His focus at that time was on securing his family’s stability while also growing professionally, driven by a genuine curiosity and love of learning.

He found that things weren’t accessible to him in the usual ways, so he started buying books — going to bookshops and choosing titles on economics, policy, foreign affairs, local governance. Each time he’d read, take notes, and compile them into a kind of personal journal. He started seeing how he could apply these ideas in his work. He moved from local organizations to the Red Crescent in Sudan, took on more responsibilities, and became increasingly creative because he was connecting what he’d learned from books with his hands-on experience and his deep knowledge of the country and its people. People noticed his creativity and started giving him more challenging tasks. Today he works on missions across 6 different countries and has reached a very senior administrative level at the headquarters of the Red Crescent and Red Cross. The key message from both stories is this: success doesn’t necessarily mean reaching an international role or moving between countries. I’ve met highly successful administrators who made an enormous impact working in their own village, city, or country. We shouldn’t tie success only to international or regional work — everything starts from where you are.

Faisal Mislit: True. An inspiring story, and that last point is excellent — because I was one of those people who struggled with this exact assumption. I used to search for any opportunity to leave Iraq and become international staff. One of my managers — a colleague from Pakistan, we were in the same accommodation and he was my manager at the time — told me: “Faisal, you don’t know what it’s like out there. When you go abroad, other things change. We come from similar communities — we have social obligations, family commitments, everything. You might not be able to sustain it even if you get the opportunity.” But I was convinced I had to go. Then the 2023 earthquake in Hatay, Turkey — I went on a deployment as a project manager. The plan was three months, but due to visa requirements I had to leave Turkey and re-enter each month. I told myself: three months isn’t enough, I’ll stay five months or a year. After the very first month, I was counting the days. I was practically begging to finish the month so I could go back to Iraq.

Ali Al Mokdad: Hmm.

Faisal Mislit: One of my managers said: go back for Eid, celebrate with family, and come back. I said no, my extension is done, I’m finished. But the point is — this didn’t affect me negatively at all. On the contrary. The reason I share this example is that success doesn’t require being abroad. Right now, sitting in a village in Iraq, I’m managing a project and the Academy across 6 global countries. Location has no bearing on impact. That is the opportunity itself.

Let me take one more practical point before we close, so that what we’re sharing is useful to listeners. These organizations, the UN, and others working in this sector — how can they support youth and local leaders in facing these challenges? Not everyone can navigate these barriers on their own. They need support from institutions. So in your view, how can organizations help?

Ali Al Mokdad: I’ll talk about institutions before I talk about individuals. One of the things I worked on whenever I moved to a new country or reached regional and headquarters levels was trying to change policies and create an enabling environment — for people like the young man from Sudan, like all the talented young women and men in the Middle East and Africa — so they can grow their talent, achieve their goals, and do this work without all the artificial barriers. First, organizations must work on policies and governance, review how work is structured, and remove the assumptions that prevent people from developing. Second, they must create a work environment that builds bridges — between someone from a village and someone from a city, between local and international staff, between those working in-country and those at the regional level, between humanitarian and development work. We all need to build these bridges more actively. Third — and very importantly — we need to invest in local leadership figures who work with limited resources but who have the trust of their teams and communities and are driving real change. Invest in these people, invest in their values, and help develop them further. And practically speaking: stop importing staff from other countries to work in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Sudan, or Egypt when there are already talented, ambitious, knowledgeable people in those countries. Work with them. Stop thinking of local staff or communities as beneficiaries — think of them as partners, as the drivers of the work. They are not recipients of a service; they are co-creators of it. There is much more to say, but given our time, those are the most important points.

Faisal Mislit: Excellent. Your points and your personal story — from thinking about resigning to the shift toward self-directed learning — are very powerful. For those listening, we’ll add some useful links at the end of the podcast. Skill development and leadership require personal initiative — yes, resources need to be available, whether free online or at low cost, but the person also needs to move. Let me share one example from our current project — Local Space — in the 6 countries I mentioned. We have a coaching program where an expert like Ali goes to a country and works with organizations over an extended period, helping develop certain skills including policy and governance. This isn’t a one-off training — it’s sustained engagement. When we collected feedback, someone from the Congo said something that genuinely surprised me: “The coaching I received is better than any external consultant who came in.” He explained: “A consultant might finish after a month or two, and I’m racing to absorb everything before they leave. But you’re investing in me as a person, building my capacity over time. My organization now has access to things we couldn’t have accessed before — expertise that would have cost thousands of dollars to bring in externally.” The key message here: organizations must invest in local leadership. The ambition is there, the capability is there — the opportunity is what’s scarce. That’s where institutions can make a real difference.

We’ve been talking for what felt like just a few minutes but has been over an hour. One final thought — you made an excellent point at the start: hope alone is not enough. If you have a closing message for the young person listening now who may be frustrated, or who has left the field, what would you say?

Ali Al Mokdad: What I want to say is linked to everything we’ve discussed — but I want to focus on our role as individuals. Regardless of where you are or what your situation is, here is something practical you can do right now: take responsibility. Take responsibility for your path, your life, and your choices — and start working on it in concrete steps. First, be excellent at the work you’re doing. I’m not a fan of shortcuts — excellence in your current work is the first and most important thing. Second, invest in your individual skills: communication, diplomacy, analytical thinking, and the ability to reflect on your own situation as we discussed.

I also want to add: sometimes you need to take risks. I often say the biggest risk you can take is not taking risks at all. You might succeed, you might not — but you’ll always learn. And one of the things that has helped me most throughout my career, especially in leadership positions: invest in your team. Build a strong team with shared values and principles that complement each other. The stronger your team, the more you grow alongside them.

We’ve talked a lot about continuous learning — and learning isn’t only through formal courses. Sometimes you learn more from a conversation with someone experienced, or from listening to a podcast like this, or reading an article. Keep your curiosity alive. One thing I noticed personally as I reached senior international levels is that the higher you go, the more you may start to feel a degree of isolation — because you see things differently, and you become one of very few people from the Middle East at that level. You need to be comfortable with that isolation, while still maintaining strong connections with your family, community, and friends — because you’ll need those voices around you. Passion alone, ambition alone, and financial security alone are not enough — you need strategy and steps. And one thing I always say: the higher you climb, the more responsibility you carry to bring that ladder back down so others can climb it too.

Faisal Mislit: True.

Ali Al Mokdad: You have a responsibility to invest in people, give them opportunities, build enabling environments, and invest in your team. Try to create for others the knowledge, experience, and opportunities that came your way. And the last thing I’ll say: we’ve talked a lot about work, learning, skills, policies, and governance — but it’s very important to live your life.

Faisal Mislit: True.

Ali Al Mokdad: Sports, games, coffee. Sit with your family, your children, your parents, your community — live your life. Because life is not only work, not only a title, not only material things. You’ll be amazed at how much something simple — sitting in the sun, being with family, playing sports — gives you the energy to do everything we’ve talked about. Inshallah, these steps, along with what you shared from your own experience, will inspire people and give them the energy to take a step forward.

Faisal Mislit: Absolutely, Professor Ali — excellent and inspiring. You made a point for everyone: challenges exist everywhere. We are not promised a smooth, easy path. Let me share one quick story before closing. In 2017, when I was first hired, I kept going to my manager asking: “How do I do this activity? How do I do that one?” He said something I still think about regularly: “Faisal, if I already knew how to do all of this, I wouldn’t have hired you. I hired you precisely to figure it out. Go and work on it — go and handle it.” The point is: don’t keep waiting for someone to give you the opportunity or for the organization to hand you the solution. The challenge is part of your life. A local leader who hasn’t faced difficult experiences cannot truly lead. Every challenge you overcome becomes experience — it transforms from an obstacle into a skill, and you become stronger for it.

I wanted to share that before we close. Professor Ali — any final words?

Ali Al Mokdad: I believe the most important thing — honestly — is that no matter what happens: pressures, challenges, problems, frustration — keep moving forward. If anyone searches for me online, on LinkedIn or Google, they’ll find books I’ve published, research I’ve conducted, organizations and teams I’ve managed. But there’s also a very large part of the story that isn’t visible — the countless times I was rejected for a job, the enormous number of visa rejections, the money I spent just to access basic learning, the days working under micromanaging or high-pressure environments, the nights spent in camps far from family and country. I mention all of this because everything that people — especially in the Middle East — might be going through does not mean that this is the fate we are heading toward. It means that right now we have a challenge we’re facing, and no matter what, we must stay committed to our principles, our values, and our ambitions, and keep working. Inshallah, those listening will keep that ambition alive, keep working on it, and keep taking steps forward — whatever their goal may be. Don’t lose that hope or ambition.

Faisal Mislit: Absolutely, Professor Ali. These challenges — whether Ali’s, Faisal’s, or anyone else’s — we all faced the same. When I first started in the NGO sector, I was paying from my own pocket just to get there by taxi, with no salary from the local organization. The rejections in my inbox accumulated over months and years — possibly hundreds of job applications. This is part of the challenges we all face. When you get rejected, it doesn’t mean only you were rejected — Ali was rejected, Faisal was rejected, many others were too. But to keep going: your striving is what is required. The conversation has been rich and I know the listeners will enjoy it — but time is up and your time is precious. Thank you so much, Professor Ali, for this wonderful dialogue. Today we were reminded of real challenges, but also that true leadership is defined by how you deal with those challenges — not by the absence of them. Thank you for believing that local leadership is not just part of the solution, but is the solution. Thank you so much, and thank you to all who are listening. Inshallah we’ll meet again in future episodes.

Thank you, Professor Ali.

Ali Al Mokdad: Bravo.

Faisal Mislit: Thank you, goodbye.

Note and disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in our podcast are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of their organisations. 

Episode produced by Ka Man Parkinson, April 2026.

Thank you for visiting the HLA website, we are updating the site to reflect changes in our organisation. Contact us if you have any questions. Contact us

Opinion | How are humanitarians using AI in 2026? The case for governance and local leadership

In 2026, individual artificial intelligence tool adoption across the humanitarian ecosystem continues to outpace overall organisational readiness. What are the implications of this sharpening trend?

In this opinion piece, the HLA’s Ka Man Parkinson reflects on findings from the second phase of humanitarian AI research conducted together with Data Friendly Space. She shares her key takeaways from the research together with qualitative insights and voices drawn from convenings as well as wider sector developments, building a case for governance and local leadership as critical priorities requiring collective action.

No single actor can shift the humanitarian AI landscape alone. It takes a movement, built from contributions big and small – including yours.
Ka Man Parkinson

Navigating sectoral challenges and rapid technological change

As we are all too familiar, 2026 continues to be characterised by profound challenge for everyone in the humanitarian space – felt most acutely by those in crisis-affected contexts. Alongside this, AI developments continue to accelerate, adding to the sense of ‘noise’ and confusion across the sector.

To play our part in providing data and evidence and to promote dialogue on how AI is bearing out across the humanitarian system at large, in May 2025, we partnered with Data Friendly Space (DFS) to lead the first comprehensive global study into how humanitarians are using AI, reaching more than 2,500 respondents from 144 countries. As my research co-lead Madigan Johnson put it at the time: “we had tapped into a massive underground conversation”, signalling the huge demand from humanitarians for insights and guidance on how to navigate AI in their work. At the end of the foundational phase in November, I wrote a reflection piece on the research, outputs and sector engagement.

Our approach in 2026: from AI mapping to convening and collective action

In response to this sector demand, and as part of HLA’s broader convening strategy and commitment to local leadership, throughout the first quarter of 2026 we led the second phase of this work. We once again teamed up with DFS to focus on rapid data collection, community engagement and mobilisation through surveys and convening using digital platforms. Together with partners and contributors, we:

From the two survey waves 2025-26 with DFS and supporting engagement campaigns with the wider community, we now have data from 4,200 survey responses, attracting more than 2,700 individuals to learn more through online sessions, as well as thousands more through events, podcasts, social media engagement, and sector media including Devex.

January 2026 pulse survey: what the data is telling us

The crises and upheaval of 2025 appear to have deepened the paradox rather than resolved it: rising individual conviction set against largely static organisational readiness.

A world map shaded by respondent count, with darker orange indicating more responses. Highest concentration is in Nigeria. Record count totals 1,729. Other regions have lighter shades, indicating fewer responses.

Heat map of survey response locations from the January 2026 pulse survey. Over 80% of respondents are from the Global South/Majority – an even stronger representation than the 2025 baseline study (75%).

While the full picture is available in our research briefing note and dashboard, a few findings are worth highlighting here. Notably, AI adoption in the humanitarian ecosystem is not following a Global North-to-South diffusion pattern – the highest growth and most intensive daily usage are concentrated in regions with acute humanitarian needs, including Kenya, Sudan and Bangladesh. Looking at usage alongside organisational governance, we can see that while local organisations are the highest daily users of AI, only 13% have a formal AI policy, compared to 39% in UN agencies. This indicates that the governance gap falls hardest on those already working with less resource.

2026 is bringing governance into sharp focus

At the time of writing my personal reflection at the end of the first phase of research in November 2025, I did not see a clear consensus emerging on sectoral priorities for action and clear pathways forward. Five months on, I see AI literacy and governance crystallising as critical priorities – conversations, data and sectoral movements from this phase point to an increased convergence around these as foundational challenges.

With the rapid diffusion of AI across the ecosystem at large – driven by accessible LLMs and now agentic AI – and limited movement on organisational AI governance, right now in 2026, I believe this evidence points to humanitarian AI as a governance and protection challenge, rather than primarily as an innovation agenda.

The 2026 AI Index Report just released by the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) provides data evidencing that responsible AI is not keeping pace with AI capability: “Documented AI incidents rose to 362 [in 2025], up from 233 in 2024. Adding to the challenge, recent research found that improving one responsible AI dimension, such as safety, can degrade another, such as accuracy.”  This evidence underscores the urgency of the governance and accountability piece.

What are the sentiments across the sector? The conversation is maturing: cautious optimism with an eye on ethical risks

Across our three 2026 webinars, sentiments and lines of questioning have noticeably shifted since the August 2025 report launch. The question is shifting from “should we use AI?” to “how can we use it – responsibly?”

A virtual meeting with seven participants, each in their own video frame. Their names are displayed: Ka Man Parkinson, Lucy Hall, Madigan Johnson, Nayid Orozco Bohorquez, Rebecca Chandiru, Liz Devine, and Timi Olagunju.

Speakers at our February 2026 webinar: Beyond the hype: Ground truth on AI across the humanitarian sector held in partnership with Data Friendly Space


In 2026, humanitarians are keen to hear more about specific use cases and to learn from each other – and the discussions tend to be more focused and grounded in the reality of current capabilities and context rather than more future-facing aspirational large-scale deployments.

In webinars, attendees raise specific questions that demonstrate close engagement on the discourse including the rise of AI agents, small language models for low-connectivity settings, climate impact, data sovereignty, and local leadership.

It has been encouraging to see AI conversations becoming more mainstream among practitioners alongside what appears to be increased confidence and sense of psychological safety around these conversations, including on LinkedIn.

Looking at the survey comments, the tone can be characterised on balance as cautiously optimistic – those who point out the benefits now and in the future usually add caveats and concerns too.

A senior leader in operations at a local NGO in Somalia said:

“AI has strong potential to improve humanitarian work by supporting data collection, faster decision-making, and better targeting of assistance. However, more training and access are needed to ensure effective and responsible use, especially at local level.”

As one programme manager at a local NGO in the Philippines said:

“Since our work deals with people with complex situations, I think what AI can help in our organisation is that it can help us analyse scientifically, but it cannot replace human interface. So ultimately, we will adopt with caution.”

The human dimension and judgement are often grappled with and expressed, highlighting a tension in the use of AI in humanitarian work. I’ve noticed that the word ‘lazy‘ surfaces quite frequently in the comments and conversations, particularly respondents from Africa – from Sudan to Nigeria.

An operations manager from Nigeria, a non-adopter, said:

“AI training should not be done in a manner that will make people become lazy.”

Environmental concerns also came through. A programme team lead at a US-based INGO wrote:

“In our sector we need to address the environmental impact and exacerbated digital divide that AI is escalating.”

Another operations manager noted they use AI “only begrudgingly” given concerns about water and energy consumption.

These are considered, values-led positions that point to something important that I personally view as overlooked: near-universal individual uptake of AI tools driven by LLMs does not mean universal organisational adoption is inevitable, or required in every context. There must remain the right to say no.

An overlooked perspective? Organisational AI adoption and the case for intentionality over inevitability

To me, what the discourse often underexplores is a significant proportion of the sector who have not embarked upon AI adoption – including those who do not intend to. 22% of January survey respondents said their organisation has not yet started AI adoption but intends to, and a further 10% have no intention of adopting AI at all.

28% of survey respondents said that their organisation is currently in the AI experimentation and piloting phase. Organisations may stay in that phase for reasons of resource, governance, deliberate caution, or context.

In my view, the humanitarian AI paradox does not represent a gap to be closed in a linear way, rather it is a space to be navigated and led according to each actor in each context – with purpose and intentionality.

Yet, a conscious non-adoption decision for an organisation does not mean no action is required in this space. Individual usage will continue regardless, creating a vacuum without governance or guardrails.

In our January webinar in partnership with NetHope, Daniela Weber made the case for action on organisational policies as a critical step:

“Everyone in your staff that uses a device will come into contact with AI, either by choice, or because the tools you’re using have AI built in. So having that policy is important.”

What this points to is an informed approach to AI at the individual level and leadership at the institutional level. As Timi Olagunju articulated, this moment calls for “digital leadership”. And in our January webinar with NetHope, Mercyleen Tanui captured the organisational challenge: “AI is not an IT initiative. It is an organisational change initiative.”

Governance is emerging as a priority: from frameworks to operationalisation and accountability

At our January webinar, Esther Grieder from NetHope offered some predictions for 2026: that this could be the year of one significant AI-related error or harmful use case that forces the sector to act on standards, and that AI agents may begin appearing in organograms. These are observations from conversations, not data – but they are a stark reminder of what is at stake if governance continues to lag.

During the same session, Michael Tjalve noted that in his recent experience working across the sector, he had not seen much meaningful movement on AI policy development – and our survey data released shortly after bore that out: just a 1% increase in formal organisational AI policies between the two surveys (to 23%).

In our February convening to discuss the findings, Timi Olagunju highlighted this governance gap as a particular concern for the sector:

“The fact that AI policy is at a slow pace compared to the growth in use within the humanitarian sector is concerning. Governance frameworks provide the context in which AI can truly serve the public good.”

Liz Devine also called for shared standards specifically for humanitarians, and in doing so reframes governance as an enabler:

“One of the things the sector really needs to figure out is developing a set of minimum standards for really sensitive areas like protection and gender-based violence…we need a set of core minimum standards that organisations agree on.”

This lack of shared approaches and standards, she argued, is holding organisations back:

“I actually think that’s one of the reasons we’re seeing slower organisational adoption. Organisations are grappling with this level of risk. We don’t want to put out solutions we can’t back up with the ethical safeguards needed.”

Nayid Orozco Bohorquez reinforces this view of governance as enabler rather than inhibitor of innovation:

“Clear policies don’t stop innovation – they give people the confidence to start using AI in a responsible and open way.”

As Mercyleen Tanui advocates for with AI tools: “Right-size the tool so that you are not starting bigger by default.”

I think we can arguably apply this principle more broadly: considering right-sized governance frameworks, tools and audit requirements for each organisation and context to shape governance as an enabler, and not a burden.

Across diverse actors and contexts, there is a growing convergence: governance is a collective priority, and the direction of travel is encouraging and critical work lies ahead. As a newly-released report from NetHope puts it: “responsible AI governance is emerging but structurally fragmented” and “without shared standards to bridge this gap, responsible AI practices will continue to vary widely across organizations.”

Funders and donors have a crucial role to play. Analysis just published by Candid highlights the scale of the disconnect: 84% of nonprofits need funding to develop and scale AI tools, yet only 17% say their funders have engaged them on AI.

In a period of hyper-prioritisation, investing in AI governance may not represent the most urgent ask. Yet, when we view the humanitarian AI landscape through a protection lens, a case emerges that this is the moment when that investment is needed – to protect sensitive data, safeguard vulnerable populations, and mitigate risk at a time of acute shocks and vulnerabilities across the sector. What happens next – how emerging governance frameworks are operationalised across different contexts is critical, including the involvement and focus on smaller and local actors.

Centre local actors: harnessing contextual knowledge and innovation

In our research in both 2025 and 2026, what really emerged was the creative and resourceful applications and approaches of local actors in the Global South, which is a finding also documented by Daniela Weber in a NetHope article where she has found through her extensive work in this space that “the Global South leads innovation.”  She believes this year more AI use cases and tools will be developed locally in the Global South, particularly specialised language models and domain-specific solutions tailored to regional needs.  

In 2024, local and national actors participated in 93% of Humanitarian Country Teams (HCTs) globally (GHO Report 2025). By that logic, humanitarian AI by its very definition should meet the specific needs of these local and national actors. Their experience should be shaping the agenda in line with broader localisation processes to shift power to local actors.

Active work must be done in the AI space to counter the risk that ‘humanitarian AI’ becomes shorthand for large-scale technical deployments by well-resourced international actors, particularly when the current adoption patterns are globally distributed and bottom-up and often without governance or organisational support. This is a pivotal moment for action to counter and not perpetuate digital divides.

In our HNPW session focused on local leadership in AI development in March, Musaab Abdalhadi set the frame:

“When we talk about local leadership in humanitarian AI, we often focus on access to technology, but from my perspective, the real issue is power, not technology.”

A virtual meeting with five participants, each in their own video frame, labeled as Ka Man Parkinson, Lucy Hall, Ali Al Mokdad, Musaab Abdalhadi, and Gülsüm Özkaya, with neutral backgrounds.

Speakers at our March 2026 HNPW session: Bridging digital divides: centring Local leadership in humanitarian AI development


Musaab’s words carry weight because they are grounded in lived experience and action. In November 2025, he initiated what we believe was one of the first AI training sessions designed specifically for Sudan’s crisis context – delivered fully in Arabic, in partnership with Ali Al Mokdad and the HLA. The 28 participants – drawn from Emergency Response Rooms, youth-led volunteer groups and local NGOs – were already using AI informally and without guidance.

As a training participant reflected:

“Since the beginning of the war, we have relied on artificial intelligence to meet donor requirements – this training helped me use these tools more effectively and confidently.”

Four men sit on chairs outdoors, dressed in light traditional clothing, watching a laptop placed on a small table. Palm trees and sunlight are visible in the background.

Local responders in Sudan participating in remote-delivered humanitarian AI training in November 2025. Image credit: Save the Children in Sudan


The infrastructure reality behind many of these conversations represents significant barriers. In the January survey, a senior leader in data and information management at a local organisation in Cameroon, responding in French, described the context of low internet penetration, limited digital literacy, and rural areas where electricity is still a luxury across much of Sub-Saharan Africa. And yet, he wrote, in a world of constant change, there is a duty to adapt and level up – not for its own sake, but to improve the daily lives of the populations who are suffering.

Agency of local actors and community-centred approaches is central to this. As Ali Al Mokdad said:

“Let’s not overestimate the risks and underestimate the opportunities. Local organisations in Nigeria, Lebanon, Syria, Sudan, Kenya, Rwanda are giving us very good examples of how to leverage these tools. The main important thing is not to stand in the way of local organisations and local leaders.”

In our February webinar, Rebecca Chandiru illustrated what community-embedded AI looks like in practice:

“Once the local community is involved in building and testing the models, they become very confident and they trust that data.”

Gülsüm Özkaya, whose research focuses on AI-generated visuals from the perspective of crisis-affected people, offered a reframe that cuts through much of the international versus local debate – which may be a false dichotomy, particularly when viewing the AI landscape.

“The main divide right now is not about being global or local. It’s about being digitally fluent and AI-aware. A local organisation that masters the use of AI tools can access the opportunities and create impact as effectively as the global giants.”

Shortly before HNPW in March, I published an interview with Ivan Toga – a pulse survey respondent joining the call from Rhino Refugee Camp in northern Uganda. As Ivan summarises:

“We need an artificial intelligence that speaks the language of the donor and the language of the village where I come from. We need an AI that is good for all of us.”

Looking ahead: collective action and local leadership

We have focused efforts in these two phases of this research measuring and communicating the paradox and its implications. The next phase is about responding to it – connecting and convening humanitarian actors, and supporting collective action to find solutions in small and big ways.

To promote AI literacy and skilling, we are currently exploring microlearning guides and bite-sized content. As a direct follow-up to our January webinar with NetHope, we published a practical quick-start guide on organisational AI readiness. It is also encouraging to see new AI courses emerging across the ecosystem, including through NetHope on Kaya, a new free humanitarian AI course from Elrha, as well as nonprofit AI learning initiatives from Microsoft. These represent encouraging movement toward contextualised learning for nonprofits and humanitarians.

In the governance arena, the first instalment of the UK FCDO-funded SAFE AI Framework is scheduled for release in May 2026, with a vision to establish “the nature and scale of the humanitarian AI governance gap, why it matters and why individual agency policies cannot close it alone.” This stands alongside increasing sectoral discourse and outputs focused on governance, responsible AI and accountability.

2026 remains a critical window. Humanitarian AI will keep growing and we need to move forward with purpose – with informed, intentional, values-led choices before key decisions are made and vendors are locked in. The sector’s choices must align with our overall commitments to shift power toward local actors, and ensure the tools emerging truly serve the people and principles we are here for.

As Musaab Abdalhadi said, local actors should be at the table as co-designers, not testers. As Ivan Toga advocates, we need models built from community, not delivered to it. And as our research keeps showing us – the energy, the ingenuity, and the will are already there.

Ali Al Mokdad encapsulates the opportunities, challenges and what is at stake:

“AI tools and AI in general could be either the best or the worst thing that could ever happen to humanity and to what we do. And localising AI could take us to the best-case scenario.”

Coordinated efforts together with donors and funders and other influential actors are pivotal in the next stages to operationalise and embed sector efforts. The risk should not be placed on individuals or local actors but those who are mandated and resourced to bear this responsibility. No single actor can shift this alone. It takes a movement, built from contributions big and small – including yours.

About the author

Ka Man Parkinson is Communications Lead at the Humanitarian Leadership Academy, where she leads on global engagement and community building initiatives as part of the organisation’s convening strategy. Ka Man blends multimedia campaigns with learning and research – she produces and hosts the Fresh Humanitarian Perspectives podcast and HLA Webinar Series, building a culture of thought leadership. Her interdisciplinary background – spanning two decades of communications and marketing experience in the international education and nonprofit sectors, and an academic grounding in business management and IT – shapes her holistic and people-centred approach to her work. She initiated and co-leads the first global study to track how humanitarians are using AI in their work. Ka Man is based near Manchester, UK.

Acknowledgements

This research and convening initiative is a collective effort that would not be possible without input, engagement and support from across the sector. The author would like to thank all research participants who generously shared their experiences and insights; research co-leads Lucy Hall (HLA) and Madigan Johnson (Data Friendly Space); January webinar panellists Esther Grieder (NetHope), Mercyleen Tanui (WaterAid), Michael Tjalve (Humanitarian AI Advisory/Roots AI Foundation), and Daniela Weber (NetHope); February webinar panellists Rebecca Chandiru (Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team), Liz Devine (GOAL Global), Timi Olagunju (The Timeless Practice), and Nayid Orozco Bohorquez (now Mercy Corps); HNPW session panellists Musaab Abdalhadi (Save the Children in Sudan), Ali Al Mokdad (independent), and Gülsüm Özkaya (now IHH); and interview guest Ivan Toga (humanitarian practitioner from Uganda).
 

Note and disclaimer

This article is a personal reflection, prepared to promote learning and dialogue. It is not intended as prescriptive policy advice, or as organisational endorsement of specific individuals, organisations, technologies or approaches. Organisations should conduct their own assessments based on their specific contexts, requirements, and risk tolerances. Quotes from contributors have been drawn from webinars, interviews, and published materials; the views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of quoted individuals or their organisations. This research has been conducted independently by the Humanitarian Leadership Academy in partnership with Data Friendly Space and has received no external funding.

About the research

The January 2026 pulse survey was conducted by the Humanitarian Leadership Academy and Data Friendly Space, building on the May/June 2025 foundational study – creating a global baseline of AI adoption across the humanitarian sector. Since the report’s release in August 2025, the research has achieved significant global reach and impact: informing academic research in Türkiye, Colombia, Switzerland, and Germany; supporting an Arabic-language AI training initiative for local responders in Sudan; contributing to civil society advocacy in Ukraine; and shaping high-level and practitioner dialogue on responsible humanitarian AI at international conferences and webinars, as well as through a six-part podcast series with a focus on global and African humanitarian AI perspectives. A combined total of more than 4,200 responses have been received across the two survey waves. All reports and briefing notes are available on the research landing page in English, French and Spanish.

Thank you for visiting the HLA website, we are updating the site to reflect changes in our organisation. Contact us if you have any questions. Contact us

Opinion | Beyond resilience: Why women and girls must shape how we respond to crisis and conflict

This Women’s History Month, Claire Sanford, Director of Conflict and Humanitarian at Save the Children UK, shares a powerful reflection drawing on 26 years working on the frontlines of some of the world’s most difficult humanitarian crises – and the women and girls whose stories have never left her.

Over the past 26 years working in humanitarian contexts, many moments blur into one another, whether that’s checking into a tin hut airport on a dirt runway, cautiously going through checkpoints, displacement and refugee camps, conversations, hand gestures and facial expressions held in fragments of shared language.

The backdrop has often been uncertain and chaotic at times, conflict, disaster, displacement. Yet within that uncertainty, there is a striking clarity that emerges not from systems or strategies, but from people particularly the women and girls at the centre of these experiences.

A woman in a green headscarf smiles while holding a baby, sitting beside two young children in yellow headscarves and an older woman in a white coat, all sitting on a red and white mat indoors.
Image credit: Save the Children

Throughout my time in the humanitarian field, I have worked across several countries, and I can vividly remember the names of the women and children I have spoken with.

Their names are often etched in my mind alongside the stories they have shared of what they have endured, what they have fought to overcome, and what matters to them most. What stands out, time and again, is not only their resilience, their courage, their strength and their unwavering determination, but also the conditions and inequalities that have demanded so much of them.

Last year I met a 14-year-old girl in a dusty camp on the border of Sudan. She spoke of her fear that she may never achieve her dream of becoming a public health worker. Conflict had denied her the right to learn, something which she loved, was passionate about, and that would allow her, as she said, to “help rebuild her country.” Even in uncertainty, her ambition remained clear, despite the barriers placed in her way which denied her this choice and opportunity.

A health worker measures the upper arm circumference of a small child held by a woman in a headscarf, checking for malnutrition. The scene takes place indoors with others nearby.
Image credit: Claire Sanford

I think of the Somali mother I met in a nutrition stabilisation centre in Baidoa, her body exhausted, holding her two children—a severely malnourished two-year-old daughter barely responsive, and her four-month-old son. She had walked more than 60 miles in searing heat to reach a displacement camp, driven by the hope of finding medical treatment and food. Her journey speaks not only to her determination, but to the absence of accessible support that should have been there for her from the start and prevented the illness of her young daughter.

I think of the mother in Aleppo who shared her sense of guilt with me. She had returned to Syria in December 2024, leaving behind safety in Türkiye with hope for rebuilding her life at home. Instead, she found harsher realities, no electricity or heating, soaring food prices that meant surviving on little more than bread and water, and an overwhelming fear of how she would access medical care for her children if they needed it. Her story was one of love, sacrifice, and impossible choices, shaped by circumstances far beyond her control and her desire to return to her home country.

I think of the injured children in Syria, and in so many other conflict-affected places, who have shared their dreams: to walk again, to play football or cricket, to dance, dreams they should never have had to imagine after the remnants of conflict have taken so much from them. Their desire to reclaim their childhoods remains powerful, highlighting both their determination and what has been unjustly taken. It is a stark reminder that children must be placed at the centre of how wars are fought, regulated, and responded to so that weapons no longer define the shape of childhood.

Life for women and girls in many contexts is harder than many can imagine, shaped by structural inequalities that limit safety, opportunity, and choice.

Over the decades, and across continents, women and girls have fought inequality in all its forms. The stories I have heard and the sights I have seen are often those where inequality is at its most extreme. While some countries have made progress, many have not. But what I have come to believe is that while experiences differ widely, there are shared patterns that connect many women and girls a thread of courage, resilience, and collective determination to support one another and to keep going despite the odds.

This spirit is not new. It is the very foundation on which organisations like Save the Children were built. After the First World War, when children across Europe were left starving and malnourished, sisters Eglantyne Jebb and Dorothy Buxton were among those who refused to look away. As part of the Fight the Famine movement, they raised awareness of the suffering and demanded action, alongside others calling for change at the time. At a time when many remained silent, they chose to act—driven by compassion, courage, and a belief in a better future.

That same ethos underpins the work we do today. It is carried forward in every influencing approach, every programme, every response, every decision. And it is continually shaped and strengthened by the leadership, insight, and experiences of the women and girls we meet.

Working in the UK, it is these stories that stay with me. They bring clarity amidst complexity and uncertainty. They sharpen our focus and fuel our determination as teams to do what we can, however challenging the context may be and to defy the barriers.

They remind us that behind every decision, every policy, every intervention, every statistic, there are real lives full of hope, ambition, and dignity, and that our responsibility is to ensure those realities shape what we do.

The International Women’s Day 2026 theme Give to Gain is not just an idea but rather it is something I have seen lived out repeatedly. Women and girls, often with the least, continue to lead, adapt, and persevere in the face of significant barriers. Their insight, strength, and lived experience must shape how we act.

During conflict and disaster, these stories reveal the essence of humanity. They remind us of what truly matters: safety, dignity, opportunity and the ability to shape one’s own future.

They show us that even in the most difficult circumstances, the human spirit endures, whilst also underscoring the urgency of addressing the inequalities that make such endurance necessary.

A woman with blonde hair, wearing a red Save the Children jacket over a black-and-white striped shirt, stands outdoors in front of a wooden fence and green plants.
These stories are not only reflections of hardship. They are a call to action. They are reminders that a just and equal future for every woman and girl is not only necessary, but possible if we continue to listen, to act, and to stand alongside them.
Claire Sanford

About the author

Claire Sanford is a dedicated humanitarian leader with more than 26 years of experience championing the rights, safety, and dignity of children and vulnerable groups in complex crisis settings. From her early work in mine action across South Asia and the Middle East to leading global emergency responses with Save the Children, Claire has worked alongside local teams and partners in contexts affected by conflict and disaster including Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Somalia, and Indonesia guided by a commitment to upholding children’s rights and supporting community-led efforts to ensure their safety and dignity.

Now serving as Director of Conflict and Humanitarian at Save the Children UK, she leads a dynamic team working in partnership with colleagues, partners and communities to influence policy, advocacy, and humanitarian response for children affected by conflict. Her leadership extends beyond her role through trustee positions and strategic partnerships that strengthen accountable, locally informed, and ethical humanitarian action. A committed advocate on crises such as those in Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan and Syria, Claire works to ensure that the perspectives of affected communities are reflected in global decision-making and calls for stronger, more equitable international action.

Thank you for visiting the HLA website, we are updating the site to reflect changes in our organisation. Contact us if you have any questions. Contact us

7 Questions for 7 Humanitarian Leaders

Nominate a humanitarian leader you would love to hear from!

A graphic with a vintage microphone shaped like the number 7, text reads “7 Questions for Humanitarian Leaders,” Humanitarian Leadership Academy logo, and colorful speech bubbles over a faded image of two people talking.

With more than 1.2 billion young people aged 15–24 worldwide, young people make up 16% of the global population (United Nations). According to United Nations Volunteers, 33% of youth globally are engaged in volunteering through humanitarian and community action.

Across the world, young people are vital contributors to community response. They are active in civil society and often provide both formal and informal humanitarian support – especially during times of crisis. Yet their leadership, insight, and impact are too often overlooked.

At a time in history when more than ever before, the future of humanitarian action sits in a quandary – due to limited financial resources amongst many more challenges. The HLA is choosing to amplify voices of the future who are rising above these challenges and already acting now.

In line with the Humanitarian Leadership Academy’s commitment to supporting local leadership and connecting humanitarian actors, we are launching a new podcast series to spotlight young humanitarian leaders and the work they are leading in their communities.

7 Questions for 7 Humanitarian Leaders will feature seven thoughtful, in-depth conversations with 7 guests nominated by you – members of the HLA global community. Together, we’ll explore their journeys as humanitarian responders – their motivations, challenges, inspirations, aspirations, and the realities of leading change from the frontlines.

Get involved!

This series has a dual purpose: to strengthen collective learning across the sector, and to recognise the contributions of young humanitarian actors whose work often goes unseen. By sharing their stories, we aim to increase visibility, appreciation, and access to opportunities that can positively shape the future of their work and the communities they serve.

We believe that inspiration leads to action and that motivated people inspire others in turn.

Is there a humanitarian leader you would love to hear from? Someone whose work has inspired you, or whose journey you’ve always wanted to learn more about? Perhaps there’s a question you’ve never had the chance to ask.

Nominate them via this form and help us amplify the voices of young leaders shaping humanitarian action.

As former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said: “You are never too young to lead, and never too old to learn.”

Let’s learn from young leaders, together.

For questions, contact info@humanitarian.academy or F.Okomo@savethechildren.org.uk

Newsletter sign up